High-performing agentic AI for enterprise workflows
We provide custom contextual evaluations, fine-tuning, and monitoring for agentic AI to work seamlessly in any use case
.avif)
AI agents are only as intelligent as the data that shapes them.
To make reliable decisions, they need more than massive datasets—they need context, judgment, and domain expertise.
micro1 combines human expertise with advanced AI to evaluate and train agents that deliver real-world value

Challenges
Performance and ROI
Models hallucinate, behave unpredictably, and do not offer a reliable method to demonstrate ROI for agents.
Evaluation Gaps
Agents are rarely tested against real procedures, edge cases, or compliance requirements and once deployed, they are left without ongoing evaluation.
Trust and compliance remain a black box
Usage of AI systems are often opaque with unclear compliance risks, making it difficult to trust them and safely scale their use.
micro1's solution
Contextual evaluations built on real workflows
We design evaluations that reflect how AI agents are actually used in production, grounded in real tasks, decisions, and success criteria instead of generic benchmarks.
.webp)
.webp)
Expert-level human influence
Domain experts evaluate agent outputs in realistic scenarios to surface reasoning gaps, edge-case failures, and risky behavior that automated tests do not catch.
Data-driven improvement loops
Evaluation results feed directly into targeted data generation, fine-tuning, and ongoing monitoring so agent performance improves and stays reliable over time.
.webp)
.webp)
Bulletproof, multi-layered QA
Every dataset goes through multiple layers of review, from expert validation to manager oversight and automated checks. Quality is reinforced at every stage to ensure outputs are complete, accurate, and aligned with client standards.
How it works
Contextual evaluation design
Expert-calibrated human judgment
Failure mode analysis
Improvement pathways
Continuous evaluation
.webp)
Contextual evaluation design
Define realistic scenarios and success criteria based on real employee workflows
.webp)
Expert-calibrated human judgment
Domain experts evaluate agent outputs against desired outcomes
.webp)
Failure mode analysis
Identify where and why agents break down, including edge cases and high-risk decisions
.webp)
Improvement pathways
Evaluation results translate directly into targeted data, fine-tuning, and workflow changes

Continuous evaluation
Agents are re-evaluated over time to maintain reliability, alignment, and performance
.webp)
